Authorization

Registration

Forgot password?


Forgot password

  • English version
  • Русская версия
EGF
The European Geopolitical Forum

Friday 23 May 2025

  • Registration
  • Login
  • About
    • Who we are
    • What we do
    • Issues we work on
    • EGF in Press
    • What makes us different?
    • Staff
    • Affiliated Experts
    • Why is geopolitics important?
    • Expert Presentations
    • EGF Partners
    • Contact Us
  • Forum
    • In progress
    • Archive
    • Terms & Rules
    • Registration
    • Help
  • Experts
  • Context
    • News
    • Publications
    • Events
    • Documents
    • Maps
    • Members Area
    • Book reviews
  • EGF Shop

Advanced Search

Context
Publications Geopolitical Change and the Re-Emergence of the Middle Corridor

Fuad Shahbazov By Fuad SHAHBAZOV, Baku-based independent regional security and defence analyst

As the war in Ukraine escalates and becomes more violent, global food and energy recession risks continue to increase, in turn further heightening the likelihood of a global economic recession. The new full-scale war revealed particular vulnerabilities of the Western block of countries, particularly on energy and supply chain management, due to their imposition of sanctions and export restrictions on Russia. Hence, new security challenges in Europe have forced the Western block of countries to explore new and safer trade routes while avoiding Russian territory. With the West’s search for new and safer trade routes, the Middle Corridor—a joint venture composed of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, and Türkiye—has regained strategic prominence. READ MORE

  • October 29, 2022
Publications Balancing the mediators - Armenia and Azerbaijan should avoid offending Russia

Benyamin Poghosyan By Benyamin POGHOSYAN, PhD, Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies

The trilateral statement of November 10, 2020, which ended the 2020 Karabakh war seemed to sideline the US and France, who with Russia had for decades co-chaired the OSCE Minsk Group, from involvement in any post-war conflict settlement arrangements. It established instead a Russian monopoly in mediating future arrangements in the region. Neither Washington nor France was involved in preparing the November 10 statement, while the deployment of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno Karabakh fomented the role of Russia as the only security provider for Nagorno Karabakh Armenians. Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia signed another trilateral statement on January 11, 2021, focused on restoring communications. The leaders' November 26, 2021, summit aimed to promote a border delimitation and demarcation process. In late 2021, the West started taking small steps to re-insert itself in the negotiation process, with the President of the European Council organizing the first Aliyev – Pashinyan summit in Brussels. READ MORE

  • October 29, 2022
Publications Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway: An Example of “Matching Model Relations”

Nuray Alekberli By Nuray Alekberli, Researcher, Strategic Studies Consulting Company, Baku

In August 2022, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Georgia have signed an "Agreement amongst three countries on preliminary information exchange for the facilitation of transit customs procedures within the framework of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars (BTK) railway project" (az.trend.az, 19 August). This agreement aimed at simplifying customs procedures and accelerating border crossing procedures within the framework of the BTK railway project through organizing an electronic exchange of initial information about goods (report.az, 18 August 2022). Therefore, somehow it plays the role of a new breath from a technical point of view to remove obstacles and speed up trade and economic relations between Asian markets and Europe. READ MORE.

  • October 29, 2022
Publications New US National Security Strategy and Implications for Armenia

Benyamin Poghosyan By Benyamin POGHOSYAN, PhD, Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies

On October 12, 2022, the White House published President Biden’s first national security strategy. The document outlines the US’ primary goals for domestic and foreign policy and its future vision for the world. US national security strategies have been published every four years since the early 2000s, laying out the incumbent administration’s policy goals and strategic priorities. The 2002 and 2006 national security strategies were focused on the war on terror and democracy promotion. The Obama administration, while emphasizing democracy promotion, started to refocus the US’ attention on the Asia-Pacific region. Meanwhile, due to the 2014 Ukraine crisis, the February 2015 national security strategy included harsh rhetoric toward Russia. In December 2017, President Donald Trump focused his national security strategy on great power competition and US rivalry with China READ MORE

  • October 21, 2022
News Threat Against Gas Plant in Norway Rattles Tense European Markets

Bomb threat at Norwegian facility forces temporary evacuation and adds to concerns about the security of Europe’s energy infrastructure

  • October 17, 2022
News Winter’s Approach Raises Stakes in European Energy Crisis

Countries prepare for worst-case scenario involving blackouts and energy rationing

  • October 17, 2022
News Ukraine war: Russia dive-bombs Kyiv with 'kamikaze' drones

Russia has hit Ukraine with a wave of attacks, dive-bombing the capital, Kyiv, with what appear to be Iranian-made "kamikaze" drones.

  • October 17, 2022
News Crimea bridge: Russia 'to repair blast damage by July 2023'

Russia's government has ordered contractors to finish repairs to a key bridge linking annexed Crimea to Russia by July 2023.

  • October 14, 2022
1 ... 113 114 115 ... 1252
Choose region

© 2006—2025 European Geopolitical Forum

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact us