The European Geopolitical Forum staged an international academic seminar on "SOUTH-CAUCASUS UNRESOLVED CONFLICTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN INTEGRATION" on 08 December 2011 at University of Kent, Brussels. Click here for the program of this roundtable and here to see speaker interventions from the debate.
Members Area
- As Eastern Mediterranean’s Waters Heat Up, Turkey Should Lead An OSCE-Type Initiative In The Middle East,EGF Editorial
- EGF Turkey File,EGF Editorial
- Five good reasons to be sceptical about the "Arab Spring",Dr. Marat Terterov
News
- Iran, Russia, the United States, and Israel; No Common Ground January 28, 2012
- Japan, Russia 'far apart' on territorial disputeJanuary 28, 2012
- India to talk with Indonesia on proposed coal export curbsJanuary 28, 2012
by Marat Terterov,
EGF Director
1. What does Nord Stream mean for the energy security of the European Union?
There seems to be a strong debate about the impact of Nord Stream on EU energy security. On the one hand, we have the “side of the house” which feels that the project will make European gas consumers even more dependent on Russian gas supplies than they already are and that it will further strengthen Russian’s “grip” on the European gas imports market. READ MORE
- Saturday, 7 January 2012, 07:47
Dr Beniamin Poghosyan
Deputy Director, Institute for National Strategic Studies, MOD, Armenia
Executive Director, Political Science Association of Armenia
The Karabakh conflict negotiation process is in an obvious stalemate after the apparent failure of the Kazan summit which took place last June. Three-years of mediation efforts by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev accompanied by efforts of the Minsk Group’s two other Co-chair-state-leaders have delivered no results. The much anticipated breakthrough which should have taken place at the Kazan trilateral summit was transformed into a half page statement with no concrete steps and decisions. President Medvedev’s further efforts to move the process through bilateral meetings with Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents did not bring any meaningful results. Meanwhile, the situation in the front line is deteriorating mainly due to Azerbaijani snipers deadly attacks and retaliatory actions of Karabakh Armed Forces. READ MORE
- Friday, 9 December 2011, 05:13
- 2 comments
Prof. Alla A.Yazkova,
Institute of Europe RAS, Moscow
Over the two decades that passed after the USSR disintegration the previously rather calm and in a way peripheral South Caucasus region has become a crossroad of internal contradictions and geopolitical competition. In the subsequent years this relatively small area was gradually turned into a hotbed of numerous conflicts involving not only Southern Caucasus countries but also European and global actors. Interference from the late 1990-s of world powers, first of all the United States and European Union, substantially aggravated situation. The US interest not only in creation of an energy transportation route, but also in barring Russian monopoly domination entailed growth of contradictions that in one or another way involved regional powers – Turkey and in the recent times Iran. READ MORE
- Friday, 9 December 2011, 05:13
By George Niculescu,
EGF Affiliated Expert
In the aftermath of the failed summit hosted by the Russian president Dmitry Medvedev between his Azerbaijani and Armenian counterparts, held in Kazan (Russia) on 24 June 2011, with a view to agreeing on a peaceful settlement of the "frozen conflict" in Nagorno-Karabakh, it seems that the future of South Caucasus might be threatened by the specter of a new war. READ MORE
- Wednesday, 7 December 2011, 19:00
- 10 comments















