The Karabakh War: The Lessons of Defeat in the Cyberspace
By Lieutenant-General (Ret.) Hayk S. Kotanjian, PhD, Professor Strategic Security Studies
Reflecting on the lessons of the military aggression of Turkey and Azerbaijan against the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic and the Republic of Armenia, strategic analysts of the security institutions and processes continue to monitor the dynamics of the peace-war around Karabakh in the context of the world order transformation. Russian President Vladimir Putin at the session of the Russian Security Council of March 26, 2021, emphasizing the exceptional role of cybersecurity, pointed out the strategic priority of the development of the cyberspace resources management system. In general, this coincides with the assessments of the special significance of this security sector, voiced recently by the US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 07.04.2021
| Security
-
Are We Seeing a New National Strategy on Human Rights Emerging in Uzbekistan under President Mirziyoyev?
Embassy of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Kingdom of Belgium
On June 22, 2020, the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, signed a Decree on Approval of the National Strategy of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Human Rights. Much has been said about Uzbekistan’s efforts to reform and modernize multiple aspects of society and economy since Mirziyoyev became president in 2016. Human rights are a core area of national reform, in this respect. It should be noted from the outset that discussions around this subject in Uzbekistan during the early years of the country’s independence have not always focused on the most celebrated factors.
READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 07.04.2021
| Security
-
Armenia’s Endgame in the Aftermath of the 2020 Karabakh War Needs to be Clarified
By Benyamin Poghosyan, PhD, Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies
Still recovering from the war, it is not yet clear what Armenia's strategy is for Nagorno Karabakh. Without a coherent and consistent policy from the Armenian government, Armenia may lose what it retains of the enclave.
Almost four and half months after the end of the 2020 Karabakh war, Armenia has not yet recovered. Society is grappling with lingering questions about the reasons for the staggering defeat. The fate of the remaining Armenian prisoners of war in Azerbaijan, whose POW status Azerbaijan refuses to accept, is a top priority. The ongoing de facto border demarcation process in the Syunik region, and looming demarcations in other regions, have put additional stress on society. The current political crisis and upcoming June 20, 2021, snap parliamentary elections do not help restore stability. Different political forces actively discuss possible changes in the electoral code, and even the possibility of making some amendments to the Constitution before the elections. However, apart from the daily ups and downs of politics, Armenia faces a bigger task: that of clarifying its stance on fundamental issues regarding the new status quo in Nagorno-Karabakh. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 31.03.2021
| Security
-
Peace and Reform: Europe’s Role in the Post-Karabakh War Caucasus
By Anna Ohanyan, PhD, non-resident senior scholar in the Russia and Eurasia Program of Carnegie
Europe has a role to play in rebuilding the South Caucasus and promoting a sustainable future. One important dividend would be democracy promotion in the region. A Russian-enforced peace could be remarkably conducive to that end.
Since the Soviet collapse, Europe and Russia have remained unable to construct a common framework for security cooperation. The Kremlin has consistently pushed for grand security bargains to assert its privileged spheres of influence over swathes of the Eurasian landmass. In contrast, Europe’s normative preferences for a market economy and liberal democracy have favoured a very different approach, one based on rules and rights, in order to advance security and order in the emergent post-Soviet space. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 09.03.2021
| Security
-
In 2021 Armenia Can Only Wait and Watch whilst Others Decide the Fate of Karabakh
By Benyamin Poghosyan, PhD, Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies
Since the end of the second Karabakh war in November 2020, Armenian, Azerbaijani, and international pundits have published many opinions and assessments focusing on the war, its causes and consequences, and the decisive victory of Azerbaijan. The strategic blunders of the Pashinyan government, the Russia – Turkey deal, and the aloofness of the US, are among the hotly debated issues about what contributed to the launch of the war, and the capitulation of Armenia. Some experts seek to forecast the distant future (5-10 years). They argue that Armenia will accept its defeat, will forget about territories taken by Azerbaijan during the war, and will seek to get material benefits through establishing economic cooperation with Baku and Ankara. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 08.02.2021
| Security
-
Potential Stress Points in the Nagorno-Karabakh Ceasefire Agreement
By Alan Whitehorn, Professor Emeritus in Political Science, The Royal Military College of Canada
There are number of potential stress points in the ceasefire agreement signed by Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, but also agreed to by the president of Nagorno Karabakh on November 9th, 2020. It is a document that was signed under the duress of rapidly deteriorating war conditions for Armenians. Few within Armenia were consulted apart from some senior military leaders. It has not been ratified by the Armenian Parliament. Public disapproval has been extensive READ MORE.
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 09.12.2020
| Security
-
Russian Strategy Before and During the New Karabakh War
By Benyamin Poghosyan, PhD, Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies
The new war against the unrecognized Nagorno Karabakh Republic launched by Azerbaijan on September 27, 2020, has intensified discussions among the experts on the role of the external actors in the region. Significant attention was focused on the newly gained influence of Turkey as a supporter of Azerbaijan. However, as for now, the key player in the Karabakh conflict remains Russia, and most probably, this balance will not be changed at least in the short term perspective. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 05.11.2020
| Security
-
Tactical Reasons Behind Military Breakthrough in Karabakh Conflict
By Fuad Shahbazov, Baku-based independent regional security and defence analyst
Azerbaijan and Armenia have been locked in fierce fighting in Karabakh since September 27. Unlike in most previous clashes over this Armenian-occupied Azerbaijani territory, the present conflict has involved heavy and sophisticated weaponry wielded by both sides, but especially Azerbaijan’s Armed Forces. And while the ongoing violence is essentially a conventional war fought by two professional armies, the presence of new generation, hi-tech weaponry has sharply increased its destructive potential. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 05.11.2020
| Security
-
New War in Nagorno-Karabakh and the Role of Great Powers: What is Next?
By Benyamin Poghosyan, PhD, Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies
On September 27, 2020, Azerbaijan launched a large-scale attack along the whole line of contact with the Nagorno Karabakh Republic. This was the third flare-up in Karabakh conflict in recent four years. In April 2016, Azerbaijan again launched an attack on Karabakh, however, hostilities were stopped after four days as a result of active Russian mediation efforts without any significant changes on the ground. In July 2020, clashes broke out along the northern part of Armenia – Azerbaijan international border. However, the September 2020 attack has few in common with both April 2016 four day war and July 2020 border skirmishes. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 24.10.2020
| Security
-
Why Did the Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Process just Fail?
By Elkhan Nuriyev, PhD, Eastern Europe-Global Area (EEGA) fellow at Leipzig University
The ongoing escalation of Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh is a most serious and significant one - just not surprising at all. This is mainly due to the lack of tangible progress in the OSCE Minsk Group-led peace talks between the two sides, which have been held since 1994. The absence of substantive negotiations over de-occupation of Azerbaijani territories, return of internally-displaced persons to the regions of their origin, the unblocking of transport, economic and other communications with Armenia has fueled strong skepticism about peaceful conflict resolution. Back in the summer it was evident that the smell of a new war had already hung heavily over the conflict-torn area. READ MORE
- EGF Editor |
Published on EGF: 07.10.2020
| Security
-